0
The Lakhta Center, headquarters of Russia's state-owned gas giant Gazprom, towers over the St. Petersburg skyline. / Photo via AP

The Kazakh government has drew a clear line regarding a ruling by the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC) Court that allowed Ukraine's state-owned energy company Naftogaz to forcefully recover approximately 1.4 billion dollars from Russian state-run gas giant Gazprom, explicitly stating that the decision will not be enforced.

Kazakh Minister of Justice Yerlan Sarsembayev stated in an interview with local media outlet Zakon on May 25 that the ruling permitting the seizure of Gazprom assets—valued at roughly 1.4 billion dollars—will not take effect in Kazakhstan.

Pointing out that the decision was handed down by the AIFC Court rather than Kazakhstan’s ordinary judicial courts, Minister Sarsembayev argued that the ruling's enforcement power is strictly limited. He asserted, "Kazakhstan will not serve as a transit point for simply enforcing foreign rulings that bear no direct legal correlation to our country."

He further clarified, "Gazprom is not a registered entity within the AIFC, the contract in question does not fall under AIFC jurisdiction, and the involved parties never agreed to submit this dispute to the AIFC Court." He added that discussing enforcement at this stage is premature, noting that the AIFC Court's decision is still an initial ruling subject to appeal, giving the defendant 14 days to file an objection.

On May 21, the AIFC Court had authorized Naftogaz to forcefully seize around 1.4 billion dollars worth of Gazprom assets located within Kazakhstan, relying on a prior ruling from the Swiss Chambers' Arbitration Institution.

This development arose as Naftogaz initiated follow-up procedures to attach Gazprom's overseas assets after the Russian firm refused to voluntarily pay damages despite losing the international lawsuit.

In international commercial disputes, if a debtor corporation refuses to voluntarily comply after an arbitration award is finalized, it is standard practice to secure compulsory enforcement approval through a local court in jurisdictions where the debtor holds assets.

Operating independently from the domestic Kazakh judicial framework, the AIFC Court is an autonomous judicial body established by the Kazakh government to attract foreign investment and nurture an international financial hub.

The court operates on the foundations of English Common Law, utilizing foreign judges to preside over international financial and investment disputes, as well as the enforcement of international arbitration awards.

The Kazakh Ministry of Justice maintains the stance that the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards must adhere to domestic procedures in accordance with the 1958 New York Convention, and that Kazakhstan lacks enforcement jurisdiction given that Gazprom's corporate headquarters is located in Russia.

Foreign media outlets have interpreted the incident as a stark reflection of geopolitical realities, illustrating Kazakhstan’s reluctance to bear the diplomatic and economic burden of seizing assets belonging to a state-owned enterprise of Russia, a country with which it shares deeply integrated economic ties.

To attract Western capital and cultivate an international financial hub, Kazakhstan has consistently emphasized the independence and international credibility of the AIFC, modeling it after the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and the Singapore International Commercial Court.

                                                                                                               Kim Min-kyu